1. Why would someone consider a 1-99 Bitcoin to Cash portfolio (crypto barbell strategy), when a 40-60 portfolio is clearly better? Is it merely for clickbait value?
2. Is it possible to add bonds, gold/silver, and stocks to this analysis, and see how this goes?
1. Agree and I think a 1-5% BTC allocation is either clickbait or an honest attempt to help people get
their feet wet. 2. I’ve looked at BTC vs gold and a 3:1 in favor of BTC made sense there. It gets very complex with multi-assets due to correlations. A 30-10-60 BTC-Au-Cash would not be unreasonable. Anywho BTC dominates the volatility so most other assets look like cash in comparison.
Question:
1. Why would someone consider a 1-99 Bitcoin to Cash portfolio (crypto barbell strategy), when a 40-60 portfolio is clearly better? Is it merely for clickbait value?
2. Is it possible to add bonds, gold/silver, and stocks to this analysis, and see how this goes?
1. Agree and I think a 1-5% BTC allocation is either clickbait or an honest attempt to help people get
their feet wet. 2. I’ve looked at BTC vs gold and a 3:1 in favor of BTC made sense there. It gets very complex with multi-assets due to correlations. A 30-10-60 BTC-Au-Cash would not be unreasonable. Anywho BTC dominates the volatility so most other assets look like cash in comparison.